The point of using points

January 27, 2009

When it comes to reference programs, points often make people think of frequent flyer type rewards for participating in customer reference activities. If your vision stops there, you may be missing ways that tracking points can be used to drive a really effective customer reference program. Here’s a brief rundown of three models we’ve used with clients in the past.

1. Simple Ranking
By assigning a relative weight to different reference activities (often based on effort required from the customer) it becomes easy to track not only which customers have participated more times in reference activities, but those who have extended themselves the most. This approach doesn’t imply communicating anything to the customer, but means being able to answer the question of which customers are the most valuable references. 

Here are sample activities and how you might allocate points to each:

  • Phone call = 50 points
  • Press release = 100 points
  • Case study = 250 points
  • Onsite visit = 500 points

After tracking different customer’s participation over time, you might have a points balance for each.  By sorting from high to low, you can see at a glance which customer has contributed the most.

  • Customer D has reached 1200 points
  • Customer C has reached   800 points
  • Customer B has reached  350 points
  • Customer E has reached 200 points
  • Customer A has reached 0 points

 
2. Status Levels
The next approach involves creating different program tiers or levels with different privileges and treatment accordingly. Each tier would be established based on reaching some point total in a given time period.  Here is an example of sample tiers.  It’s not really necessary to share the details of these tiers or even their current level with the customer directly.  Levels provide a way to segment or group your customers. 

  • Tier 1 = 1,000+
  • Tier 2 = 250 to 1,000
  • Tier 3 = 0 to 250

Here is how those customers would fall into tiers:

  • Tier 1: Customer D
  • Tier 2: Customer C & Customer B
  • Tier 3: Customer E & Customer A

3. Transaction
This is the formal rewards program that first comes to mind.  We could go into a discussion of the pros and cons of a formal transaction model, but many companies have set up successful transactional rewards programs.  The key point to mention here is that the benefits you offer are often not necessarily marketing schwag, product discounts or conference tickets.   In surveys asking customers from different businesses what they’d like most to receive, the answers are often more related to things that further build the relationship, like access to executives or input to product management. 

Conclusion

While each organization is different, our most commonly recommended approach is to use points to create status levels and show your appreciation to your customers accordingly.  If you can then combine this with another angle like the brand recognition of the customer, you can have a pretty solid picture of your true VIPs and where additional evangelism of your reference  program is warranted.

If your customer reference program has only a few dozen participants, you may not need anything formal to know the contribution your customers are making.  As your program grows, having an objective measurement and a fully automated way to track becomes more critical.


Busted buying praise

January 19, 2009

belkin-mechturkI noticed this post on Crunch Gear about Belkin’s attempt to pay for good reviews and thought it should serve as fair warning to folks in the customer marketing community about the danger of faking it. 

I am sure the negative PR on this outweighs anything anyone was hoping to achieve when this plan was concocted.  I do hope this was an rogue, isolated incident and there not a larger nefarious plot sponsored by the company.

The original findings appear to have been posted on The Daily Background where you can also see some recent updates and reaction.


Search this

January 9, 2009

Here’s a quick look at what our most successful clients are using for their customer reference search options.

Customer reference management is about efficently matching the prospects with a customers that can share their experiences, making search critical to the process.  There are two primary ways of searching.

Google-Type Keyword Search

The simpliest user experience is a single keyword search box like Google.  For most of our clients, this is the number one way that they like to search.  Enter a value and be able to find references that match. 

 

Filter Search

Search filters are helpful to picking the right search term.  Your sales people may not have your industry list memorized and sometimes it just helps to show them the available options. 

Determining the right search options to offer is very specific to your business, but our advice to clients is offering fewer options is actually better. It provides a simplier experience, focuses searchers on what’s most important, and most importantly ensures there is a reasonable portfolio of customers that match the search criteria. 

While the exact search fields and values are very business specific, here are the primary dimensions we’ve seen used most successfully:

  • Solution/Product
  • Industry
  • Company Size
  • Geography
  • Relevant Value Propositions
  • Reference Activities Agreed
  • Contact Type (ie: Executive, IT Staff, Business Stakeholder)
  • Competitor Involved

We believe the right solution is a combination of Google-type and Filters, with added intelligence to show the best results even if we don’t find any match against one of the search terms. Nobody wants to create a search and see “no results found”.

Have you seen a better way of tackling this important problem? I’d love to know about it.